Centennials, part I.

I was starting to write about the implicit model of historical change behind loess curves, which I’ll probably post soon, when I started to think some more about a great counterexample to the gradual change I’m looking for: the patterns of commemoration for anniversaries. At anniversaries, as well as news events, I often see big spikes in wordcounts for an event or person.

I’ve always been interested in tracking changes in historical memory, and this is a good place to do it. I talked about the Gettysburg sesquicentennial earlier, and I think all the stuff about the civil war sesquicentennial (a word that doesn’t show up in my top 200,000, by the way) prompted me to wonder whether the commemorations a hundred years ago helped push forward practices in the publishing industry of more actively reflecting on anniversaries. Are there patterns in the celebration of anniveraries? For once my graphs will be looking at the spikes, not the general trends. With two exceptions to start: the words themselves:

So that’s a start: the word centennial was hardly an American word at all before 1876, and it didn’t peak until 1879. The Loess trend puts the peak around 1887. So it seems like not only did the American centennial put the word into circulation, it either remained a topic of discussion or spurred a continuing interest in centennials of Founding era events for over a decade.

If MySQL ever finishes building an index for me (9 hours and counting), we could look year by year at words in a sentence with “centennial” to see whether it’s Yorktown and the Articles, or if it’s still just discussion of “The Centennial.”And then after the centennial, the word remains in the vocabulary in a way it wasn’t before. Maybe it wasn’t the civil war, it was the centennial that sparked commemoration?

“Bicentennial” isn’t pushed into popular use by the New York City bicentennial in 1865, but it does rise some around the time that ‘ centennial ’ peaks. Are there any major bicentennials in 1883-1888? The biggest peak here, so far as I can tell, is the Yale bicentennial in 1901–the database should let us see who it is that drives that spike, if we’re curious.

What about the columbus quatercentenary?

A definite spike in 1892, but not nearly so big as I’d have thought. Did the city do something in 1868?

Tracking individual anniversaries is fun, but what this is really good for is comparing. I got started thinking about anniversaries looking at this unsmoothed graph of the people in Ives’ “Concord Sonata,” normalized to better see the trends. (There are a lot of issues with not accepting too naively what this graph says, which is what I was writing about then, so don’t draw too many conclusions yet):